First screen of the Cobbold Wrackline JV concept proposal, by Closewell Studio

This is a working proposal. Open it full size and try the pricing yourself.

$253.6M cost understanding, against a $265M budget

Cobbold Wrackline JV bridge design-build proposal

A two-firm joint venture was qualifying for the design-build replacement of a 1961 river bridge on a state route. The proposal is a plan set, with a staging drawing the panel can scrub across 54 months and a closure calendar that writes into the cost sheet.

We never share client details, so every proposal here is a mockup of how we design.

Government contracting · 1,640 days under trafficAll the work

Cobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, page 2, by Closewell StudioOpen the live proposal
Page 2 of the Cobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF Open the PDF

The deal

Cobbold Constructors and Wrackline Marine, with Nye Trask Engineers as lead designer, answering RFQ TSD-26-DB-0412 for Bridge 58-0412, a crossing carrying 46,200 vehicles a day.

What the selection panel needed to see

That four through lanes would stay open at every peak for the whole job, and who would carry each risk between two partners.

What we built

  • A staging drawing that scrubs through 54 months of spans and lanes
  • A closure calendar that feeds the cost sheet and the finish date
  • A joint venture chart that works as a clickable risk register
  • A quantities sheet in the DOT’s own format, with lines that can drop

Written for people who read plan sets all day

A brochure asks a DOT panel to change how it reads. A title block, a sheet number and stationing tell the Chief Engineer in one glance that this team speaks his language. The whole concept grew from one sentence in RFQ section 2.3, that the corridor shall carry four through lanes during peak periods for the full contract duration.

Stop at month 24 and count lanes

Every other bidder would write that traffic will be maintained. On TC-101 a traffic engineer drags across the job and counts. The north structure goes up first, all four lanes move onto it, the old bridge comes out, and the south structure rises in its footprint.

The option we gave up, with its price

The first traffic shift needs 312 closure hours between June 4 and August 26, 2029. The default plan of 32 nights and 2 weekends stays at 50,063 vehicle-hours of delay against the 60,000 limit, with $780,800 of closure cost in Q-701. Six weekends is cheaper for the contractor, so the page prices it and shows it breaking the limit.

A name beside every risk

Cobbold holds 60 percent and Wrackline holds 40, and both are liable for the whole job. Rock at Pier 3 opens the register with a $3.6M allowance, split into 40 points for Tamarack, 15 for Cobbold and 45 for Wrackline. The partner-failure question has its own button, out in the open.

Five readers, five sheets

  • The Chief Engineer sees who stamps what, with a 21-day review clock.
  • The District Traffic Engineer tests lane width. Eleven feet keeps a 2.75-foot shoulder and demand at 0.80 of capacity.
  • The Environmental Resources Manager sees vibrated casing keep the noise limit inside 410 feet.
  • The Procurement Officer checks 8 pass-or-fail lines, then a matrix with one exception and two partials, each with its reason.
  • The Deputy Secretary for Finance reads a peak year of $80.0M.

Mark it received

The sealed price comes in Step 2, so Q-701 stands as a cost understanding, $253,592,619 at today’s choices and $11,407,381 under budget. The only move asked for now is marking the package received or sending a question. The panel shortlists on January 15, 2027.

The detail that does the work

The open items name the rock at Pier 3, where two 1958 borings disagree by eleven feet and the team asks to drill in Step 2.

This is the live proposal on a tablet, a laptop and a phone, the way each signer opens it. Tap any screen and it opens at true size, right here.

Every proposal ships with a matching PDF.

Open full screen

Page for page with the live version, for the inbox, the board pack and the printer.

PDF · 28 pages

Open the PDFCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, inside page, by Closewell StudioCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, inside page, by Closewell StudioCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, first page, designed by Closewell Studio

$253.6M cost understanding, against a $265M budget

Cobbold Wrackline JV bridge design-build proposal

A two-firm joint venture was qualifying for the design-build replacement of a 1961 river bridge on a state route. The proposal is a plan set, with a staging drawing the panel can scrub across 54 months and a closure calendar that writes into the cost sheet.

Government contracting · 1,640 days under trafficAll the work

Cobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, page 2, by Closewell StudioOpen the live proposal
Page 2 of the Cobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF Open the PDF

The deal

Cobbold Constructors and Wrackline Marine, with Nye Trask Engineers as lead designer, answering RFQ TSD-26-DB-0412 for Bridge 58-0412, a crossing carrying 46,200 vehicles a day.

What the selection panel needed to see

That four through lanes would stay open at every peak for the whole job, and who would carry each risk between two partners.

What we built

  • A staging drawing that scrubs through 54 months of spans and lanes
  • A closure calendar that feeds the cost sheet and the finish date
  • A joint venture chart that works as a clickable risk register
  • A quantities sheet in the DOT’s own format, with lines that can drop

Written for people who read plan sets all day

A brochure asks a DOT panel to change how it reads. A title block, a sheet number and stationing tell the Chief Engineer in one glance that this team speaks his language. The whole concept grew from one sentence in RFQ section 2.3, that the corridor shall carry four through lanes during peak periods for the full contract duration.

Stop at month 24 and count lanes

Every other bidder would write that traffic will be maintained. On TC-101 a traffic engineer drags across the job and counts. The north structure goes up first, all four lanes move onto it, the old bridge comes out, and the south structure rises in its footprint.

The option we gave up, with its price

The first traffic shift needs 312 closure hours between June 4 and August 26, 2029. The default plan of 32 nights and 2 weekends stays at 50,063 vehicle-hours of delay against the 60,000 limit, with $780,800 of closure cost in Q-701. Six weekends is cheaper for the contractor, so the page prices it and shows it breaking the limit.

A name beside every risk

Cobbold holds 60 percent and Wrackline holds 40, and both are liable for the whole job. Rock at Pier 3 opens the register with a $3.6M allowance, split into 40 points for Tamarack, 15 for Cobbold and 45 for Wrackline. The partner-failure question has its own button, out in the open.

Five readers, five sheets

  • The Chief Engineer sees who stamps what, with a 21-day review clock.
  • The District Traffic Engineer tests lane width. Eleven feet keeps a 2.75-foot shoulder and demand at 0.80 of capacity.
  • The Environmental Resources Manager sees vibrated casing keep the noise limit inside 410 feet.
  • The Procurement Officer checks 8 pass-or-fail lines, then a matrix with one exception and two partials, each with its reason.
  • The Deputy Secretary for Finance reads a peak year of $80.0M.

Mark it received

The sealed price comes in Step 2, so Q-701 stands as a cost understanding, $253,592,619 at today’s choices and $11,407,381 under budget. The only move asked for now is marking the package received or sending a question. The panel shortlists on January 15, 2027.

The detail that does the work

The open items name the rock at Pier 3, where two 1958 borings disagree by eleven feet and the team asks to drill in Step 2.

This is the live proposal on a tablet, a laptop and a phone, the way each signer opens it. Tap any screen and it opens at true size, right here.

Every proposal ships with a matching PDF.

Open full screen

Page for page with the live version, for the inbox, the board pack and the printer.

PDF · 28 pages

Open the PDFCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, inside page, by Closewell StudioCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, inside page, by Closewell StudioCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, first page, designed by Closewell Studio

$253.6M cost understanding, against a $265M budget

Cobbold Wrackline JV bridge design-build proposal

A two-firm joint venture was qualifying for the design-build replacement of a 1961 river bridge on a state route. The proposal is a plan set, with a staging drawing the panel can scrub across 54 months and a closure calendar that writes into the cost sheet.

Government contracting · 1,640 days under trafficAll the work

Cobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, page 2, by Closewell StudioOpen the live proposal
Page 2 of the Cobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF Open the PDF

The deal

Cobbold Constructors and Wrackline Marine, with Nye Trask Engineers as lead designer, answering RFQ TSD-26-DB-0412 for Bridge 58-0412, a crossing carrying 46,200 vehicles a day.

What the selection panel needed to see

That four through lanes would stay open at every peak for the whole job, and who would carry each risk between two partners.

What we built

  • A staging drawing that scrubs through 54 months of spans and lanes
  • A closure calendar that feeds the cost sheet and the finish date
  • A joint venture chart that works as a clickable risk register
  • A quantities sheet in the DOT’s own format, with lines that can drop

Written for people who read plan sets all day

A brochure asks a DOT panel to change how it reads. A title block, a sheet number and stationing tell the Chief Engineer in one glance that this team speaks his language. The whole concept grew from one sentence in RFQ section 2.3, that the corridor shall carry four through lanes during peak periods for the full contract duration.

Stop at month 24 and count lanes

Every other bidder would write that traffic will be maintained. On TC-101 a traffic engineer drags across the job and counts. The north structure goes up first, all four lanes move onto it, the old bridge comes out, and the south structure rises in its footprint.

The option we gave up, with its price

The first traffic shift needs 312 closure hours between June 4 and August 26, 2029. The default plan of 32 nights and 2 weekends stays at 50,063 vehicle-hours of delay against the 60,000 limit, with $780,800 of closure cost in Q-701. Six weekends is cheaper for the contractor, so the page prices it and shows it breaking the limit.

A name beside every risk

Cobbold holds 60 percent and Wrackline holds 40, and both are liable for the whole job. Rock at Pier 3 opens the register with a $3.6M allowance, split into 40 points for Tamarack, 15 for Cobbold and 45 for Wrackline. The partner-failure question has its own button, out in the open.

Five readers, five sheets

  • The Chief Engineer sees who stamps what, with a 21-day review clock.
  • The District Traffic Engineer tests lane width. Eleven feet keeps a 2.75-foot shoulder and demand at 0.80 of capacity.
  • The Environmental Resources Manager sees vibrated casing keep the noise limit inside 410 feet.
  • The Procurement Officer checks 8 pass-or-fail lines, then a matrix with one exception and two partials, each with its reason.
  • The Deputy Secretary for Finance reads a peak year of $80.0M.

Mark it received

The sealed price comes in Step 2, so Q-701 stands as a cost understanding, $253,592,619 at today’s choices and $11,407,381 under budget. The only move asked for now is marking the package received or sending a question. The panel shortlists on January 15, 2027.

The detail that does the work

The open items name the rock at Pier 3, where two 1958 borings disagree by eleven feet and the team asks to drill in Step 2.

This is the live proposal on a tablet, a laptop and a phone, the way each signer opens it. Tap any screen and it opens at true size, right here.

Every proposal ships with a matching PDF.

Open full screen

Page for page with the live version, for the inbox, the board pack and the printer.

PDF · 28 pages

Open the PDFCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, inside page, by Closewell StudioCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, inside page, by Closewell StudioCobbold Wrackline JV proposal PDF, first page, designed by Closewell Studio

Tell us the deal in a line. We’ll read it and come back with a plan and a price.

Try

Tell us the deal in a line. We’ll read it and come back with a plan and a price.

See the work

Tell us the deal in a line. We’ll read it and come back with a plan and a price.

Try

Got a deal on the calendar?

Leave your email and we'll reach out to talk through the deal, the buyers and the date it needs to be signed.

Prefer to send the RFP? Upload it here

Tableside sample proposal mockup designed by Closewell StudioPlatewell Automation sample proposal mockup designed by Closewell StudioPartwise sample proposal mockup designed by Closewell Studio

Closewell Studio is a Raised Media Co. venture.New York, NY